State v. Speicher
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This appeal by James Speicher challenges the sufficiency of the proof offered by the State to sustain his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of Iowa Code section 124 .401(l)(b)(7) (1999). We transferred the case to the court of appeals. That court affirmed the conviction but, on Speicher’s application, we granted further review. Because we are convinced the record contains no proof on the essential “agreement” element of conspiracy, we now vacate the court of appeals’ decision and reverse that portion of the district court judgment.
The facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. CasadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Regle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- State v. CasadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- State v. MappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. NitcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State of Iowa v. Christine Ann KernSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. FintelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. CorsiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.