State v. Shupe
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
¶1 — This appeal follows a successful prosecution for delivery, possession with intent to deliver, and manufacture of marijuana. The defendant freely admitted that he possessed, delivered, and manufactured marijuana and he claimed to do so under authority of the former Washington State Medical Use of Marijuana Act, chapter 69.51A RCW. Neither the affidavit in support of the search warrants nor the evidence presented at trial addressed the defendant’s showing that he was authorized to possess and deliver marijuana, and we therefore reverse the convictions.
FACTS
¶2 Scott Shupe, along with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ReisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. MarkwartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. ShupeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Scott Shupe v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Laurie SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.