Redmond v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Petitioner-applicant, by his guardian ad litem, seeks review and annulment of an opinion and decision after reconsideration issued by the board on July 19, 1973. The principal question is whether the board’s decision after reconsideration, which reduced the referee’s award of 100 percent permanent disability to 20 percent permanent disability, is supported by the evidence.
Applicant, a 63-year-old motor coach operator employed by the City and County of San Francisco since 1955, sustained injury to his face, neck, left hand and left leg on May 13, 1970, when a young female…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bstandig v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kahle v. Plochman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Amico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ferreira v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.