Legal Opinion

McKibben v. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1937No. 23768. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

The sole question here is whether item fifteen of the will of Katherine M. McKibben violates the rule against perpetuities. The circuit court of Cook county held that it did not, and from its decree the present direct appeal was taken, a freehold being involved.

At the time of her death Katherine M. McKibben was a widow. Her only heir-at-law was a son, Thomas Stanley McKibben, one .of the plaintiffs and appellants. By item thirteen of her will the testatrix bequeathed only one dollar to him, because, as stated, of his conduct toward her during her lifetime “and his evident lack of the faith…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kellett v. ShepardIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Howe v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Carter v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lawrence v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Starr v. WilloughbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carter v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Corwin v. RheimsIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Harrison v. KampIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Monarski v. GrebIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. ShellabergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API