Legal Opinion

Kraft v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1920No. 5554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

—The appellant was convicted of swindling B„ C. Haehnel out of $7, by falsely representing himself as agent of a certain newspaper establishment, the averments so far as is necessary to quote being as follows: “did induce said B. C. Haehnel to pay to the said D. B. Kraft, and the said D. B. Kraft did then and there by the means aforesaid acquire from the said B. C. Haehnel the sum of $7, as evidenced by a certain cheek of the said B. C. Haehnel which the said D. B. Kraft later cashed and obtained thereon the sum of $7, current money of the United States of the value of $7,'the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Andrus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Fitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API