Legal Opinion

George R. Sutton v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1972No. 72-1542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Sutton, a serviceman on active duty with the United States Army, sought and was granted habeas corpus relief in the form of immediate discharge from the armed forces. Appellants contend that the district court did not have jurisdiction to entertain Sutton’s action for want of the necessary custodian within its territorial limits. The sole question confronting us is whether jurisdiction vested in the District of Utah.

In June of 1971, while stationed at Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah, Sutton submitted an application for dis charge from the armed forces as a conscientious objector pursuant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Feliciano v. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Richard A. Miller v. The Honorable John A. Chafee, Secretary of the Navy, and J. D. Stevens, Cdr., Commander Escort Squadron OneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Raymond F. Carney, Jr. v. Secretary of Defense, Melvin LairdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sholars v. MatterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Miller v. Secretary of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1971
  3. Sholars v. MatterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Sholars v. MatterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API