Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 2004No. A03-1451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Richard J. Coleman committed *331professional misconduct warranting public discipline, including, leaving a courtroom while trial was in session, failing to adequately supervise a nonlawyer assistant, failing to appear in court on time, failure to deposit advance retainers in trust, failing to return client property and failing to cooperate with the Director’s investigation in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(b),. 1.15(a), 1.15(d), 3.2,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST A.B., a Minnesota Attorney, Panel Case No. 35121Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API