Legal Opinion

Tamay-Ludizaca v. Attorney General of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 3, 2014No. 13-1577Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Juan Francisco Tamay-Ludizaca petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition.

Tamay-Ludizaca, a native and citizen of Ecuador, entered the United States without inspection in December 2000. Immigration proceedings began in July 2010, when he was charged under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i) as being present in the United States without inspection or parole. Tamay-Ludizaca’s hearings before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) were conducted with the aid of an interpreter. In the first…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Takky Zubeda v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API