Tamay-Ludizaca v. Attorney General of the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Juan Francisco Tamay-Ludizaca petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition.
Tamay-Ludizaca, a native and citizen of Ecuador, entered the United States without inspection in December 2000. Immigration proceedings began in July 2010, when he was charged under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i) as being present in the United States without inspection or parole. Tamay-Ludizaca’s hearings before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) were conducted with the aid of an interpreter. In the first…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Takky Zubeda v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.