In re Wyler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
This appeal, which is technically moot, raises a complex and important procedural issue relating to the hospitalization of the mentally ill. When the government proffered a social worker from the Washington Hospital Center as an expert witness, the court precluded her testimony without conducting voir dire. The government proffered very little information, legal or factual, and the record does not permit us to determine whether she was qualified to testify as an expert on mental illness and dangerousness. Lacking a sufficient record on which to rule, we exercise our…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dyas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re B.C. C.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re: M.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re: M.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014