Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Kincheloe

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 11, 1986No. 6245-7-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The State appeals the trial court's vacation of Roberto Juarez Castillo's habitual criminal status. We reverse.

On February 24, 1976, a jury found Roberto Castillo guilty of the crime of grand larceny. Mr. Castillo's attorney requested the preparation of a presentence report, but the court refused, concluding probation was not available as a sentence alternative because of the revocation of Mr. Castillo's previous parole status.

On September 8, 1977, Mr. Castillo pleaded guilty to the crime of forgery. Subsequently, Mr. Castillo was tried and found to be a habitual criminal, which resulted in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. Vernell Teynac HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BraithwaiteWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API