Legal Opinion

Ockerman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 28, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Nicholas Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

The appellant, Herman Ockerman, was jointly in-dieted with Ed Bradley for robbery. . They were given separate trials and each was found guilty. Ockerman appeals and asks a reversal upon two grounds. He insists, (1) that his motion for a peremptory instruction directing the jury to find him not guilty, should have been sustained; and (2) that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence.

The prosecuting witness, Taylor Arnold, testified that while he was riding in his buggy on the public highway, *754near Moorefield, between 10 and 11 o’clock on Sunday…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Commonwealth v. BoazCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Knipp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Gravitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API