Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 21, 2013No. 2D11-2626Published

1Concurrence

CASANUEVA, Judge,

Specially concurring.

I fully concur in the majority opinion. I write only to remind counsel that to present a legal challenge to the constitutionality of a search, a defendant must establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the item searched. To meet this burden of proof, the defendant may be called upon to testify.

“The United States Supreme Court has held that Fourth Amendment rights are personal and a defendant has the burden to establish that his own Fourth Amendment rights have been infringed.” Hicks v. State, 929 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (citing Raleas v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. Erwin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. ManciniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API