Legal Opinion

Gorgens v. McGovern

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 30, 2007No. 993265CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Fahey, Elizabeth M., J.

The plaintiff, Richard A. Gorgens (Gorgens), brought this action against the defendants, James V. McGovern and Nancy F. McGovern (collectively, the McGoverns), to collect on a promissory note. On remand, this court now considers an appropriate award of attorneys fees and costs pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §6F solely attributable to defending against the promissory note claim. For the reasons stated herein, this court ORDERS that attorneys fees be awarded to the McGoverns pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §6F in the amount of $261,576.25 plus costs and interest.

BACKGROUND

Gorgens…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. International Totalizing Systems, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API