People v. Rochester Dime Savings & Loan Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the.Monroe Special ‘Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mon:roe on the 2d day of March, 1896, granting the sum of $1,000 to the defendant as an additional allowance of costs.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the.Monroe Special ‘Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mon:roe on the 2d day of March, 1896, granting the sum of $1,000 to the defendant as an additional allowance of costs. Plaintiff’s complaint stated that the Superintendent of Banks had, :in March, 1891, caused an examination to be made of the books, man.•agement and affairs of the defendant, and that the Superintendent of Banks had reported to the Attorney-General the results of such -examination, and that…
1Opinion of the Court
Hardin, P. J.:
In H. R. T. Co. v. W. T. & R. Co. (135 N. Y. 394) the subject-matter litigated was the right of the defendant to use the single trolley system, and in the course of the opinion Maynard, J., said : If the right sought to be perpetually enjoined has a money value, and there was any evidence in the moving pajiers tending to -.establish such value, the court had jurisdiction to entertain the motion, and it was its duty to exercise its discretion and dispose of the application upon its merits. We have examined the record sufficiently to satisfy us that there -was some proof of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. Germania Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Meyer Rubber Co. v. Lester Shoe Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895