Legal Opinion

DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. Swenson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 25, 2010No. 2009AP564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. Charles Swenson worked as a truck driver for deBoer Transportation. The question in this case is whether, under Wis. Stat. § 102.35(3),1 deBoer Transportation illegally refused to rehire Swenson after he recovered from a work-related injury. The Labor and Industry Review Commission concluded that deBoer failed to show "reasonable cause" for its refusal to rehire Swenson, as required by § 102.35(3). We conclude that the commission's reliance on an incorrect interpretation of the reasonable cause standard caused it to err in ruling against deBoer. Accordingly, we reverse the circuit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Bend Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Dielectric Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. WISCONSIN DEP'T OF REVENUE v. A. Gagliano Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. Ray Hutson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. SwensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cargill Feed Division/Cargill Malt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  3. DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API