Legal Opinion

(PC) Ray v. Hasem

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00072Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY D. RAY, No. 2:21-cv-0072 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 O. HASEM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Before the court are plaintiff’s motion for a forty-five-day extension of time 20 to file an in forma pauperis application, ECF No. 9, and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, 21 ECF No. 10. 22…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clarence Duke McGann v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Deblasio v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API