Legal Opinion
State v. Duarte
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 2004No. 23,310PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} The issue in this case is whether an out-of-court statement made by Defendant’s accomplice, implicating Defendant, was admissible when the accomplice did not testify and was not subjected to cross-examination. In the statement, the accomplice admitted attempting to sell marijuana to an undercover police officer, but claimed that Defendant had given him directions about how to complete the sale. We take this opportunity to consider the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) on New…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ZamarripaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HendersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- New Mexico Gamefowl Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. BelangerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.