Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Arthurs v. Omodt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1987No. C3-86-1026Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Julie Arthurs appeals the trial court’s denial of her writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

FACTS

The State of Montana charged Julie Ar-thurs with the felony of Deceptive Practices in violation of Montana Code 45-6-317(l)(a). By proper application, Montana requested extradition from Minnesota, and Arthurs was arrested in Minnesota and charged as a fugitive from justice under Minn.Stat. § 629.13.

The facts underlying the Montana charge are set out in the extradition application:

In April or May, 1985 Miss Arthurs reported to her landlord, Vernon Steinert, *222that she was having some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. State ex rel. O'Malley v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. State ex rel. Fowler v. LangumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Walker v. Ramsey County District CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API