Legal Opinion

Saridakis v. United Airlines

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 2001No. 00-16141; D.C. No. CV-97-00628-WHOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Saridakis appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment with respect to his claim that United retaliated against him in violation of state and federal statutes prohibiting discrimination based on disability as well as his state law claim that United wrongfully terminated him. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and do affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we do not recount it here except as necessary to explain our decision.

*8151. Retaliatory Termination

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Richard McAlindin v. County of San Diego Rudolph Tamayo Edward Baker Gabriel Rodriguez Does, One Through 50, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Crest Catering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API