Legal Opinion
Coney v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 5, 1994No. 93-1164PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
643 So.2d 654 (1994)
Manning CONEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1164.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 5, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
2Per curiam
The State concedes that the trial court made insufficient findings of fact before allowing the victim to testify by closed-circuit television. See § 92.54(5), Fla. Stat. (1991); Hopkins v. State, 632 So.2d…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Salgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Lazana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Wingo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015