Legal Opinion

Amaya v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 1994No. 93-3339PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse and remand for a new trial because of the trial court’s error in refusing appellant access to counsel during an overnight recess at trial. We reject appellant’s claims that the trial court erred in denying motions to dismiss and for directed verdict.

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in refusing appellant access to counsel. See Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 96 S.Ct. 1330, 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Bova v. State, 410 So.2d 1343 (Fla.1982). Further, we are unable to determine that the error was harmless under the strict test set out in State v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bova v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Voudry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API