Legal Opinion

Tibbetts v. West & South Town Street Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Memorandum.—Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

At the time the ordinances permitting the construction of appellee’s railway were enacted, there was in existence the following statute:

“ The city council or board of trustees shall have no power to grant the use of, or the right to lay down, any railroad tracks in any street of the city, to any steam or horse railroad company, except upon a petition of the owners of the land representing more than one-half of the frontage of the street, or so much thereof as is sought to be used for railroad purposes.”

The question here presented is not as to the necessity for such a petition as is prescribed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Stetson v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. City of East St. Louis v. O'FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. North Chicago Street Railroad v. CheethamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Stewart v. Chicago General Street Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Kirchman v. West & South Towns Street Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  5. Bond v. Pennsylvania Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API