Legal Opinion · Dissent

Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2013No. 2010-CT-02084-SCTPublished

1DissentKitchens, Justice

¶ 27. The majority finds that the defendants sufficiently met their burden of persuading the circuit court that the record reflected no genuine issues of material fact, entitling them to judgment as a matter of law. Since I am convinced that the plaintiff has shown that there is indeed a genuine issue of material fact, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 28. Karpinsky had to show two things to overcome the motion for summary judgment and proceed with the prosecution of her slip-and-fall case: (1) that the defendants had actual or constructive knowledge of the spill; and (2) that they had a sufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. RB Wall Oil Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. McGee v. Maryland Casualty CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API