Legal Opinion
Dolman v. United States Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint is short and simple.
The defendant, owner of certain property, leased it to the plaintiff for a term of years. The lease contained the customary covenant of quiet enjoyment. It also included a clause retaining in the landlord an option to cancel in the event of condemnation for public use, and provided that in the event of such condemnation the tenant was not to be entitled to any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mack v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Snow v. . PulitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bentrovato v. CrinnionNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Lindwall v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Lowe v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Schisgall v. Fairchild Publications, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Lowenschuss v. KaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Dolman v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.