Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Frederick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Mecosta. (Fuller; J.) Replevin. Plain tiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The plaintiff brought replevin against defendant, as sheriff of Mecosta county, for a stock of goods which had been seized as the property of one Abram Mark-son. The goods were and always had been in Markson’s possession, and he was carrying on business under the name of “ A. Markson, Agent.” It is claimed by plaintiff that the business was his business, in charge of Markson as his agent. It is claimed by defendant that as against Markson’s creditors this apparent arrangement was a fraud, and that in fact the concern was Markson’s, and the agency named was used to cover it up. The ease has…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mead v. GliddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API