United States v. Estrada
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Ernesto Araon Estrada was found guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We reject his argument that the conviction was based on an illegal search and seizure and affirm.
Appellant makes no contention that the search and seizure in and of themselves were improper, except insofar as they resulted from an illegal stop of appellant’s vehicle by Border Patrol agents. To justify the stop, the government argued below that the “Chekar” device, by which the agents first detected appellant’s vehicle proceeding north on Farm to Market Road (FM)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Mansfield SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Rogelio Del BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Arnaldo Melendez-Gonzalez, A/K/A Lebrado Mendoza-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Valentin Escamilla and Cosme Sanes EscamillaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Maria De Jesus GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Santos Angel Sosa, Jr., and Rolando Sosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Roberto MacIas and Raul MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.