Legal Opinion
McDonald's Corp. v. Rappaport
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 28, 2008No. Civil Action. No. 07-11397-JLTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff McDonald’s Corporation (“McDonald’s”) asserts that the Highlander Plaza shopping center in Salem, Massachusetts, is violating a restrictive covenant contained in a ground lease between McDonald’s and the shopping center. Specifically, McDonald’s challenges Highlander Plaza’s legal authority to lease space to an International House of Pancakes (“IHOP”) franchisee for the operation of an IHOP on the premises. For the following reasons, (1) Plaintiffs request for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs breach of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Kobayashi v. Orion Ventures, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Suffolk Construction Co. v. Lanco Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Asociación De Educación Privada De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. García-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCullen v. CoakleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Ritter v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022