Legal Opinion

People v. Caufield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under the facts of this case, the prosecution was not required to produce at the suppression hearing the dispatcher of the radio transmission to prove that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant. Here, unlike People v Lypka (36 NY2d 210), the content of the radio transmission itself demonstrated that the sender possessed the requisite probable cause for the police to act. The information transmitted included the facts that the dispatcher received a telephone call from JoAnn Buda, who said that her house was then being shot at by a driver…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. LypkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. CrespoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. People v. LeGrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API