Star Transport, Inc. v. Pilot Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part · LoveLove, J.
U respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with the majority in so far as it consolidates the appeal with the writ application and dismisses the appeal. Additionally, I agree with the majority’s finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Pilot’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. I disagree, however, with the majority’s denial of Pilot’s writ application seeking review of the trial court’s denial of its exception of prematurity and its motion to stay pending arbitration. I also disagree with the majority’s decision to remand the matter for an…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Tobias.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Collins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Nauru Phosphate Royalties, Incorporated, (Texas) v. Drago Daic Interests, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.