Legal Opinion
MH Residential 1, LLC v. Barrett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 14, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.
On this appeal we consider the rights of tenants whose leases have expired prior to the acceptance for filing of the sponsor’s non-eviction conversion plan and whose tenancies are not subject to any tenancy protection statutes or regulations such as the Rent Stabilization Law or the Rent and Rehabilitation Law. We affirm the determination of Appellate Term that because respondents’ leases expired before the sponsor’s condominium conversion plan was accepted for filing, respondents are not entitled to the protections of the Martin Act (General Business Law §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Stahl Associates Co. v. MapesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Eight Cooper Equities v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- MASTAS v. Extra Closet, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- MH Residential 1, LLC v. BarrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- 11114 101 Ave Corp. v. Ramlogan, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025
- 300 East 64th Street Partners, LLC v. BoissevainCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016
- Kessler v. Carnegie Park Assoc., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- MH Residential 1, LLC v. BarrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013