Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Shomer

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 25, 2025No. 3:25-cv-05479Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 HARVEST CYCLE DAVIDSON, Case No. 3:25-cv-05479-TMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v. 10 KIM M. SHOMER; FREEMAN LAW FIRM 11 PLLC, 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. ORDER 15 This matter comes before the Court upon reviewing Plaintiff Harvest Cycle Davidson’s 16 complaint and pending motions. Dkt. 10; Dkt. 11; Dkt. 12; Dkt. 13; Dkt. 14; Dkt. 15; Dkt. 16. 17 Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.,

546 U.S. 500, 514

(2006) (The Court has “an independent obligation to 18 determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists.”). 19 Mr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API