Sigur v. Sigur

liSCHOTT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s motion to change one aspect of a consent judgment. The underlying issue is whether a party to a consent judgment who asserts that mutual consent to the judgment was vitiated by an error of fact is entitled to be relieved of one obligation imposed upon him by the judgment without regard to the remaining aspects of the judgment.

These parties were married in December 1982 and were divorced in January 1986. Two children were born of the marriage. After a number of rules were filed over the years by both of them seeking to…