Legal Opinion

Pool v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1990PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Randolph Eugene Pool was convicted of the unlawful possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. This conviction must be reversed because the indictment failed to properly charge Pool with an offense.

The indictment charged that Pool "unlawfully possess[ed] marihuana, a controlled substance enumerated in Schedule I, Section 20-2-23 of the Code of Alabama, contrary to the provisions of The Drug Crimes Amendments Act of 1987, in violation of Section 13A-12-212 of the Code of Alabama." Prior to the enactment of the Drug Crimes Amendments Act of 1987, this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Druid City Hospital Bd. v. EppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Shelton v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Ex Parte Roberts.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Adams v. MathisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Governor Siegelman v. Alabama Assn., S. Bds.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Pool v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API