In re Marshall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtClarke, P. J.
The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York in March-, 1889, at a General Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.
The petition charges that the respondent has been guilty of misconduct as an attorney at law as follows:
Charge No. 1. That the respondent converted to his own use $623.34, given to him by a client to be expended for a specific purpose; also that the respondent falsely represented that said moneys had been applied for the purpose given, and…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re ShalleckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930