Legal Opinion

Ceres v. Shearson Lehman Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered February 28, 1995, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ complaint and papers in opposition to the motions fail to indicate that the offering plan included actionable representations of fact and " 'definite positive projections that might require later correction’ ” on which plaintiffs relied to *223their detriment (San Leandro Emergency Med. Group Profit Sharing Plan v Philip Morris Cos., 75 F3d 801, 811). Leave to replead…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kocourek v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. Xerox Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Perrucci v. CIGNA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API