Legal Opinion

Janakus v. Storino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 12, 1977No. Nos. 76-196, 76-536 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Perlin

These consolidated appeals question the correctness of the trial court’s orders appointing Dr. Willaim D. Storino, respondent, as guardian of the estates and persons of the minors, Paul and Ralph Storino, and the trial court’s denial of visitation privileges to petitioner, Cheryl Janakus. Petitioner argues that a guardian ad litem should have been appointed to represent the minors’ interest during the custody proceeding, and that the trial court arbitrarily denied her visitation privileges.

In cause 76-196 the following is disclosed by the record. Ralph Storino was bom in 1969, and Paul…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fultz v. HauganIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Chodzko v. ChodzkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Danville v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Orrway Motor Service, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of StorinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. In Re Estate of SteinfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API