Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

On September 27, 1923, the defendant Tinklepaugh entered into a contract with the defendants Stark, in which Tinklepaugh agreed to sell and the Starks agreed to purchase a *128farm in the town of Sodus for the sum of $25,000. The vendees made the first payment amounting to the sum of $5,506.40, and in February, 1924, went into possession of the farm. They made no further payments upon the principal but did make payments of interest amounting to $3,224. The vendees thereby acquired an interest in the real property described in the contract. (Elterman v. Hyman, 192 N. Y. 113, 125.)

The vendees “…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. Burnazos, Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. BurnazosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. Schoenberg v. SchoenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sebok v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API