Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Edwin Burkhart

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1923No. 7842Published

1Opinion

ON EEHEAEING.

June 13, 1923.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

No occasion is found for a modification of the views expressed in the original opinion touching the matters then before the court.

In the motion for rehearing, however, there is contained an averment not embraced in the original application, namely, that the judgment was entered without notice to the parents of the relator. This is supported by appellant’s father. Such notice is necessary. The court is without jurisdiction to enter a judgment of this kind against an infant in the absence of this notice. Ex parte Cain, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 509,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Ex Parte GordonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Ex Parte GuinnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API