Stansberry v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge. —
Conviction is for possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
Several special charges were requested and refused but no exception to the action of the court is noted on the charges over the judge’s signature, nor is such exception brought forward by formal bills. Exception must be reserved in one form or the other. Linder v. State, 94 Tex. Crim. Rep. 316, 250 S. W. 703; Nichols v. State, 91 Tex. Crim. Rep. 277, 238 S. W. 232; Thomas v. State, 100 Tex. Crim. Rep. 288, 273 S. W. 571.
In two bills appellant complains…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Dozier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984