Amherst & Clarence Insurance v. Cazenovia Tavern, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court with direction to dismiss the action as moot.
This action is for a declaration as to the obligation of the insurer to defend appellant in an underlying tort action. Nothing in the submissions of the parties suggests that the intervening settlement of the tort action has not rendered the issues in the declaratory judgment action moot.
Any agreement or understanding the parties may have reached not to disclose to our court the fact or circumstances of such…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Merkle v. Guardianship of JacobyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Lotz v. LotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Stulz v. 305 Riverside Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- State Automobile Insurance v. Young Men's Republican Club of Allegheny County, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Tri-State Consumer, Inc. v. Mintz & Gold, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.