Legal Opinion

Langford v. State Bank Trust Co., Etc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 8, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Rees

Affirming.

On October 25, 1931, Virgil Tewmey and James A. Tewmey executed deeds of assignment for the benefit of their respective creditors. Virgil Tewmey is the son of James A. Tewmey and for a number of years bad been conducting the farming operations on a farm owned by his father. It bad been bis custom to borrow money from the State Bank & Trust Company of Harrodsburg on notes signed by him and bis father. He bad written authority from bis father to sign James A. Tewmey’s name on notes executed to the bank, but be had no written authority to sign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. Whitlow's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  2. Chestnut Street Trust & Saving Fund Company's Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Whitlow's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  4. Pool v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Hellman v. KieneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API