Legal Opinion

Brush Grocery Kart, Inc. v. Sure Fine Market, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2001No. 00CA0711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NIETO.

Plaintiff, Brush Grocery Kart, Inc. (Grocery Kart), appeals that part of a judgment determining that the risk of loss from damage to real property that occurred after plaintiff exercised an option to purchase the property and before transfer of legal title fell on plaintiff, We affirm.

Grocery Kart leased real property from defendant, Sure Fine Market, Inc. (Sure Fine). A provision of the lease granted Grocery Kart an option to purchase the property. The parties agree that Grocery Kart exercised the option according to the terms of the agreement. The parties also agree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. District Court, Sixth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. KaneshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Chain O'Mines, Inc. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  4. Konecny v. Von GuntenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. People v. BrowningColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brush Grocery Kart, Inc. v. Sure Fine Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API