Legal Opinion

Lochte v. Moeschler

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888Published

Appeal from an order of the Monroe special term, held on the 4th day of March, 1887, setting aside a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Moeschler, entered on the 20th day of March, 1886, for the sum of $1,423.20 recovery and $37.05 costs.

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

Sufficient and satisfactory reasons appear by the record for granting the order appealed from, and the same should be affirmed. The action was for the dissolu*764tian of a copartnership existing between the parties, and for the settlement of their accounts.

The defendant Moeschler was personally served with the summons and complaint, and appeared in the action by an attorney, but made default by not serving an answer to the complaint. % The other defendant,. Engle, appeared and served an answer, in which he admitted all the material allegations of the copartnership dealings and ‘transactions.

After…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darling v. . BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API