Legal Opinion

State v. Guevara

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 7, 2003No. 04-02-00568-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.

Rachel Guevara was found guilty by the municipal court of violating section 22-140(b) of the City of San Antonio Code, which provides that “[i]t shall be unlawful for a business establishment ... to allow patrons to queue on, or wait for entrance into the business establishment on the public right-of-way of the River Walk area.” On appeal, the county court reversed the municipal court’s judgment and dismissed the complaint, holding that section 22 — 140(b) is unconstitutional. We affirm, holding section 22 — 140(b) is unconstitutionally vague because it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GuevaraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Valero Refining-Texas L.P. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. State of Texas v. Guevara, Rachel L. v. Guevara, Rachel L.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Valero Refining - Texas L.P v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API