Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Franklin Interurban Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ms. Justice Dyes

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this opinion Franklin Interurban Company, C. V. Buttrey and L. L. Treanor, D/B/A Tennessee Trailblazers are referred to as “Appellees,” John C. Hammer, C. L. Pentecost and Hammond Fowler, Commissioners, composing the Tennessee Public Service Commission as “ Commission, ” and the Greyhound Corporation • as “Appellants.”

• The facts in this matter are not in dispute. Appellees in March 1960 at the request of the principal transported high school students from Murfreesboro, Tennessee to Nashville, Tennessee to attend a basketball tournament at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodroof v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. N. C. & St. L. Railway & L. & N. Railroad v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  3. West v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McGill & Daugherty v. KefauverTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sallee v. BarrettTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  3. Kenneth J. Sigel, M.D. v. The Monarch Condominium Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  4. Robert E. Lee Flade v. City of Shelbyville, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2024
  5. United Physicians Insurance Risk Retention Group, by and through Douglas M. Sizemore, Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance v. United American Bank of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API