Legal Opinion
Kuntz v. Spence
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 14, 1931No. 12563Published
1Opinion
On Appellees' Motion for Rehearing.
The objections made by counsel for appellants to the submission to the jury of special issue No. 7 have been re-examined, and the same will now be set out in full, and were as follows: I
“Defendants except and object to the submission of Special Issue No. 7, because of each and all of the reasons heretofore- given to Special Issue No. 6. Further because it allows and permits the jury to consider whether said plaintiff might or should have reasonably expected to receive from the said Toy Spence without taking into consideration whether said child would have-…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houston City Street Railway Co. v. SciaccaTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Flippen-Prather Realty Co. v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Oil Belt Power Co. v. TouchstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Schaff v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. BustillosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.