Legal Opinion

State v. Guillermo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1999No. 21718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

Defendant-appellant Florendo Guillermo appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion for resentencing filed on June 4,1998, pursuant to Hawafi Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 35 (1980) 1 and Rule 47 (1977). 2 Guillermo contends that the circuit court erred in (1) concluding that Guillermo’s case did not fall within the purview of Act 188, Hawaii Session Laws of 1975, and (2) failing to enter sufficient findings of fact pursuant to State v. Ortez, 60 Haw. 107, 588 P.2d 898 (1978). We agree with both contentions and, accordingly, vacate the June 19,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HuelsmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Keawe v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PutnamHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API