State v. Bailey

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon, and, from the judgment and sentence, he appeals.

The first point urged involves a jurisdictional question, whether appellant’s constitutional rights were violated in not first being accorded a preliminary examination prior to the filing of the information against him. We are not impressed with this claim of error. No jurisdictional question is presented. The information charging the assault upon Arthur J. Ward was filed by the district attorney on August 5, 1955. The following day, the accused,…