Moore v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, justice:
The sole question presented on this Petition for Special Action is whether the State is entitled to pre-trial discovery of certain psychiatric reports in the possession of the defendant.
Robert Bruce Moore, the defendant, stands charged with armed robbery and attempted murder. He duly filed notice, in both causes, of his intention to plead not guilty by reason of insanity in accordance with Rule 192, subd. A, Rules of Crim. Proc., 17 A.R.S. 1 Subsequently, the court granted the motions of the State and the defendant, and appointed two psychiatrists to examine the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Beckman v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Campbell v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.