Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Jonsson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2010No. 09-1169, 09-1237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

James and Brooke Fredericks and their daughters, E.F. and S.F., (collectively the Plaintiffs) sued Dr. Mary Margaret Jonsson, a licensed psychologist, for failing to warn them of the danger posed by Troy Wellington. Wellington had attempted to break into the Plaintiffs’ home a few days after Dr. Jonsson had evaluated him for the Colorado probation department. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Jonsson, ruling that Colorado’s mental-health-professional liability statute, Colo.Rev.Stat. § 13-21-117 (Section 117), protected Dr. Jonsson from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McIntosh v. MilanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Perreira v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Martinez v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Milne v. USA Cycling Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Gavin v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  3. Thiebaut v. Colorado Springs UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. Lasting Hope Recovery Ctr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Marcellot v. Exempla, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API